<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing Nepal Army Under People: American Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.com.np/2006/06/07/bringing-nepal-army-under-people-american-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.com.np/2006/06/07/bringing-nepal-army-under-people-american-perspective/</link>
	<description>We blog for peace and democracy in Nepal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: harish</title>
		<link>http://blog.com.np/2006/06/07/bringing-nepal-army-under-people-american-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-18817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.com.np/united-we-blog/2006/06/07/bringing-nepal-army-under-people-american-perspective/#comment-18817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[integration process is not easy. one side there is nepal army grown in royalist perspective  having elite officers from particular background ,in other hand PLA having communist ideology,having aggressive nature and in the favour of transformation. if we see in depth, lower level of nepal army , are also looking some changes in the system of nepal army, we must accept that there is high discrimination between  different level of hierarchy in nepal army. if we can develop some model which can  integrate at individual level ,it will be sucessful. it is not always wise to see that past will dominant in future.lets work together and find the solution be positive but tacticsal way.
wel come for any comment]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>integration process is not easy. one side there is nepal army grown in royalist perspective  having elite officers from particular background ,in other hand PLA having communist ideology,having aggressive nature and in the favour of transformation. if we see in depth, lower level of nepal army , are also looking some changes in the system of nepal army, we must accept that there is high discrimination between  different level of hierarchy in nepal army. if we can develop some model which can  integrate at individual level ,it will be sucessful. it is not always wise to see that past will dominant in future.lets work together and find the solution be positive but tacticsal way.<br />
wel come for any comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bideshi</title>
		<link>http://blog.com.np/2006/06/07/bringing-nepal-army-under-people-american-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-18816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bideshi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.com.np/united-we-blog/2006/06/07/bringing-nepal-army-under-people-american-perspective/#comment-18816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I guess for you the proper time for reform of the (R)NA is when they are no longer required, huh&quot;

Actually, that is exactly when we can best afford the upheaval,infighting, and political fallout of reform: AFTER the Maoists are defeated. We are in a life-or-death of our nation struggle now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I guess for you the proper time for reform of the (R)NA is when they are no longer required, huh&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, that is exactly when we can best afford the upheaval,infighting, and political fallout of reform: AFTER the Maoists are defeated. We are in a life-or-death of our nation struggle now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

